A Nice Smile but can you really trust this guy? Raphael Grossi, head of the IAEA. [/caption]
Time to Call Out the Perfidious Imperialist Powers
Let's state openly that these three organizations, the IAEA, the OPCW and the OSCE, are tools of the imperialist powers, exemplified especially by the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union countries, and their military arm, NATO.
Call Things by Their True Name
First of all, let's call things by their true name. In recent years, the term 'globalists' has floated around. It seems to mean those who see things from a global point of view. But what we're really talking about are the Imperialist Powers of Europe and the United States, who have exercised control--hegemony--starting in 1492, when Columbus invaded the Western Hemisphere. Here Imperialism means Empire, which is marked by
Ruthless Expansionism
Land and resource theft
Lies and broken promises and broken treaties and agreements
Slavery, genocide and exploitation of indigenous people
Brutal methods of subjugating populations that the Empire comes into contact with
The Original Perennial Purveyor of Perfidity--Great Britain
What is perfidious Albion?
Perfidious Albion is a term used by some people to describe the British Empire. It is a term that suggests that the British were deceitful and treacherous in their dealings as an Empire. As such it is a term used by those wanting to portray the British Empire in a negative light. The term is quite old but in the context of the British Empire (it was used about England previously) it is commonly attributed to French playwright Augustin Louis de Ximénès.
Even 'Mussolini’s fascists used the term to criticize Britain’s empire and dominance.'
Let's take each one of these perfidious, nefarious organizations one by one.
IAEA The Atomic Energy Agency and Raphael Grossi
Violation of Professional Integrity Regarding Iran
As of June, 2025, Grossi, as the head and spokesperson for the organization has been told by Iran that his activities, inspecting its nuclear facilities severely compromised Iran's security, resulting in the assassination by Israel of several Iranian nuclear scientists.
He criticized without evidence, insinuating that Iran was not acting within the rules of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, thus 'justifying' both the Israeli and US attacks.
What's worse, he has been in contact with the Israelis to discuss...what? Israel is not a signatory of the Treaty, yet gets a free pass.
Worse yet, Grossi failed to condemn the attacks which are themselves a gross violation of the treaty:
Iran allowed inspections yet was punished, without evidence. This invalidated the purpose of the treaty.
Justifiably, Iran refuses him access any longer, yet Grossi whines and threatens Iran, demanding he continue his same behavior.
Violation of Professional Integrity Regarding Russia and Ukraine
Following years of the Ukrainian government attacking people in Eastern Ukraine, after the US sponsored coup in 2014, Russia heeded the request of the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics and started its Special Military Operation. It quickly took control of the major Zaporozhye Nuclear Power Plant. "Some party" has been shelling the plant ever since. It's easy to tell where the shelling is coming from--Ukraine. This puts all Europe at risk if the shelling results in release of radioactivity. Yet. Grossi has adamantly refused to call out the Ukrainian regime for its gross violation of international law.
Inescapable Conclusion: Grossi Acting As a Spy and Agent for the Collective West. He's not a neutral observer.
The OPCW: Enabler of Chemical Warfare
The OPCW was charged with inspecting Syria's chemical weapons. At one point, it accused Syria of using chemical weapons against its own people. This charge was suspicious because Syria was defeating anti government rebels. Shortly before inspectors arrived, an attack occurred, which was blamed on Syria in official documents. However, several inspectors who were actually on the ground, disputed the final report. The accusations against Syria, like accusations against Iraq's WMD in 2003, were falsified and politicized.
Expert on such weapons, Professor Ted Postol, agrees that the OPCW report, which was used by the US to attack Syria, were politicized and false.
The OSCE: Neutral Observer in the Donbass, or Spotter for Ukrainian Attacks?
The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe monitored the Minsk Agreements.
OSCE Findings:
The OSCE Special Monitoring Mission reported observing a significant increase in explosions, with 553 explosions in Donetsk alone.
In February 2022, there was a significant escalation in shelling activity in eastern Ukraine, with the number of explosions reported by the OSCE increasing dramatically. The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) reported over 1,400 explosions in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, which are at the center of tensions between Russia and Ukraine. While the initial claim of a transition from 40 to 1400 shells per day is not explicitly stated in the provided search results, the general trend of increased shelling activity is well-documented.
OSCE’s mission in Donbass, which the organization itself claims to be “arms control, promotion of human rights, early warning, conflict prevention, crisis management” has already failed. In fact, it has continually been failing for 8 years now, because how else could you call the fact that the Ukrainian shelling of the people of Donbass never stopped. Worse yet, former president of the post-Maidan Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko once openly stated that “our kids will be going to school freely, while their kids will be hiding in basements”. So much for the “president of all Ukrainians”. OSCE never reacted to such statements.Needless to say, OSCE’s “post-conflict rehabilitation” not only failed (since it failed to achieve any of its previous goals), but is highly unlikely to ever be conducted by OSCE, given that the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics have effectively banned the organization and ordered it to leave their territory. Now, why would the leadership make such a move? Hasn’t OSCE been helping for the last 8 years? Well, it turns out that they didn’t just do anything to prevent the conflict from raging for the last 8 years, but they might have even done certain things to facilitate it. Source: Southfront.In a rather disturbing revelation by war correspondent Alexander Sladkov, OSCE has used high-resolution cameras, originally placed to conduct ceasefire monitoring, to relay DNR and LNR positions to the Ukrainian military which would then use the provided data to target or correct their artillery fire at the DNR and LNR forces. Sladkov further explains how the OSCE mission in Donbass provided the Armed Forces of Ukraine with their observation data, captured by cameras and other monitoring equipment they installed over the last 8 years.
In essence, OSCE was spying and effectively waging war on the side of the post-Maidan Kiev regime. To make matters worse, the provided monitoring data also included the movement of regular Russian military personnel in the last 50+ days
Following the Minsk Agreements which were supposed to resolve the dispute between the Kiev coup regime and the people in the Donbass region of Ukraine, it was the job of the OSCE to montor the agreement. The problem was that the Kiev regime and its German and French backers never intended to implement the agreement. Instead, Ukraine forces continued shelling civilian areas for 8 years. The OSCE turned a blind eye to the violations.
See this article that I wrote on this topic earlier:
https://bumblebuddhist.com/no-more-games-no-more-delusions/
I personally knew a fighter for the Donetsk People's Republic, Russell Bentley, who said that he was instructed to hold fire, even if fired upon. And every bullet or shell was strictly controlled with punishment for violations. He explicitly told me that when he saw a civilian with her legs blown off after a Kiev plane bombing run hit a civilian building, that he decided to fight those who were clearly fascists.
Conclusion
Is it any surprise that the Collective West, which notoriously attacked Iraq based on lies about Weapons of Mass Destruction, or Libya about 'distributing viagra to its soldiers', not to mention the earlier lies about the Tonkin Gulf attacks that precipitated the Vietnam War, and any number of other examples, would employ supposedly neutral international organizations to tilt the scales?
On a final note: Regarding Iran's nuclear program. President Trump has insisted that US bombs and missiles 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear program. Two major problems:
Targeting nuclear facilities violates the NPT. Not to mention, would result in massive dispersal of radiative contamination. This is totally irresponsible.
President Trump claims that these bombs penetrated from the surface to the caves where the nuclear material was supposedly located. If so, the radiation would be easily detectable. Instead, there has been no mention of it. Therefore, it is 'highly likely' that there either was no radioactive material, or that the bombs never penetrated. Thus, another lie exposed.
*****
As you can see, my work involves not just research but also travel expenses. So if possible please help out. I will never charge for access, because ‘Truth is Priceless”. But if you’d like to help out, you can do it in different ways.
You can visit one of my shops where you can get an Awareness Building Item.
Use the items as conversation starter.
Or you can donate through my paypal email address, e_arnow@yahoo.com
Or on Substack
Share this post